Category Archives: investing

Let Profit be the Motivator

Most of the world is driven by power and profit so let’s use those noble ambitions.

We seemed to forget that we live in a world of finite resources. We are in a small boat in the ocean of the universe. I recently read a fun book, “Solar” by Ian McEwan, that was as crazy fun as it was insightful.  Let me quote and paraphrase a few paragraphs.

Coal and oil, amazingly cheap energy sources, have made our civilization, lifting hundreds of millions out of poverty subsistence levels.  In the past 200 years, Europe, North America and parts of Asia and South America have thrived, now along comes India, China, and Africa.  We barely understand how successful we have been.

This is an outstanding way to look at the world and realize without cheap efficient power we could have never lifted our civilization out of an agrarian society.

But oil will run out.  Peak production is within the next 10 – 20 years. Prices will rise, production slows down. Politically unstable regions control supply, but worst, is we are pumping tons of CO2 into the air. We either slow down and stop or face economic and human catastrophe in grand scale within our grandchildren’s lifetime.

We are beyond the point of being able to model change to the environment and climate, all we know is that it will change and has become unstable. Look at the Arctic ice melt predictions.

“The planet is sick…….  Curing the patient is a matter of urgency and is going to be expensive, perhaps as much as 2% of GDP or far more if we delay treatment.”

No one really knows how much it will cost or how solve the problems, but we do know entire industries must adapt and change processes and that cost can not possibly be measured.

“How do we slow down and stop while sustaining our civilization and continue to bring millions out of poverty.  Not by being virtuous, not by going to the bottle bank or turning down the thermostat, or buying a smaller car.  That merely delays the catastrophe. ……. This matter has to move beyond virtue.  Virtue is too passive, too narrow.  Virtue can motivate individuals, but for groups, societies, a whole civilization, it’s a weak force.  Nations are never virtuous though they might think sometimes they are.”

A big slap in the face. But this does not mean we should stop mitigation efforts. We need to slow down the negative externalities, so we can figure out the solutions. And, no, we are not as virtuous as we think we are.

“For humanity en masse, greed triumphs virtue. So we have to welcome into our solution the ordinary compulsions of self-interest, and celebrate novelty; the thrill of invention; the pleasures of ingenuity and cooperation; and the satisfaction of profit.”

Ok, now this points to a solution that we can understand! It is little Gordon Gekko-ish “greed is good,” but it is true. Only by strong market forces — market demand — will people be willing and able to develop and invest in the solutions that are needed. Nothing scales without a profit. It will only be viewed as charity. Profitable ventures attract more capital that drive the impact we seek. We need these drivers to create change, and we need government policy to back off the outdated regulations that prevent change and put in place new accelerators that enable change.

  • Share

The End of Many Things

As the old saying goes, “Things, they are a’ changing…”

Recently, Scientific American raised an interesting issue in its cover article, “Eternal Fascinations with the End.” Is it the end? Are we truly facing our own demise? If so, how do we respond to this? Or do we just ignore it?

The facts of the world and what is happening is being bantered about a lot, but how the world will actually change is not at all predictable.  The book, “The Next 100 Years” also does a fine job of showing that as much as we think we can extrapolate from science, technology, religion and environmental issues, we still don’t have good way to predict significant outcomes.   So, the doom and gloom forecasts that cover the news headlines are really no more reliable then a rosy outlook.

Does this mean we should ignore all the bad news in the environment and the pending disasters? Should we bury our heads in the sand and just hope things work out for the best? Not at all.  It just means we need to get comfortable with what we don’t really know.  We can not model the future to any accuracy or certainty an outcome worthy of a good gambler.  But we can not stand still.  We need to act.

We know that the atmosphere composition is changing and that man is pumping ominous amounts of poisons into the air. We know the chemistry and species of the oceans are changing and man is dumping poisons by the giant ship load into them.  The soils that grow our food are being depleted and exhausted and run off into the oceans, repeating the toxic cycle. The bio diversity of all creatures is shrinking at an alarming rate, interrupting the natural cycle of life.  And we know that the ground we’re standing on is being dug up for all of the earths finite materials. Yes, the world is changing and we, the people, are mostly responsible for this change.

Recently, Scientific American raised an interesting issue in it’s cover article: “Eternal Fascinations with the End” Is it the end? Are we truly facing our own demise? If so, how do we respond to this?  Or do we just ignore it?

We can’t know what the true net effect of all this change will be. One thing is certain, however. If you liked what we had in the past and what we still have today, you had better find a way to embrace change. That is unavoidable.  And it will not be pretty.  If you want a good dose of global reality read “Eaarth” by Bill Mckibben.  It will scare the daylights out of you.

  • Share

Can the US Deliver on Innovation in the Energy Sector?

Big Question!  We pride ourselves on innovation and the power to execute on those ideas that propel the next economy. Silicon Valley is the example, but is it the rule.  Yes we innovated the Semiconductor, PC, Communications systems, Software, Internet, IP Communications, Digital Media and the like.  But now, this next wave of key infrastructure innovation in energy and the many resources we have taken for granted, requires the cooperation and backing of government.  An effective government in policy and practice.

Here is the challenge,  when France can build a beautiful suspension bridge on time and on budget and we couldn’t get the Boston big dig done in less then 10 years and two times over budget or the San Francisco Bay Bridge that has yet to be finish, years over due and way over budget. When China can build  42 high speed bullet train lines of thousands of miles of  tracks and we can’t get a plan  for one line past the drawing boards.

Both business and investors question the viability of our government as stated in the Op-Ed piece “Watching China Run” that they prefer to look at opportunities “overseas because right now in America’s wacky, dysfunctional public sector there is no clear vision of a viable clean-energy economy, and, thus, no clue about how to get there.”  China is walking away with the sector.  Innovation occurs where the demand is.  If we don’t develop the demand, the innovation will never come to fruition.  Yes, we have the most extraordinary venture capital system in the world, but if there is no market , then it will not deliver.

The demand for new enhanced forms of clean energy, must come from mandates, policy changes that are at odds with many incumbent big businesses in energy.  It can not come from the development itself.  Many people liken the new energy sector to the communications era of the 90′s.   It has many parallels.   The new digital technology was coming on line and many dreamed of all the potential of the new services and revenue that it could bring.  But, what really made the industry kick was competition.  MCI, Sprint, and host of others came into the market, deregulation followed, and the break up of the world’s largest monopoly, ATT.  This is why we have the Internet today with all its services.  If the competition didn’t evolve the public policies wouldn’t have changed.   We have to force the changes by active policy changes that allow competition and drive demand. It is our best method to drive the new market.  We are not China, where government policy drives all.  We will need policy and competition, then we can have a big thriving market.

Any discussion welcome on this challenging topic.

  • Share

What is a Sustainable Venture?

Being in the Venture Capital industry for over 25 years, I can remember hearing the pitches of many companies in diverse sectors such as Communications, Semiconductors, Software,  and Hardware Systems which were all claiming to be “sustainable”.  It always had implied a definition of longevity based on revenue and profit growth over time, due to good execution of a business model that satisfied the customers needs over time.

This is now an insufficient definition.  The word sustainable now incorporates a worldly view.  Are you making mankind and the environment better off then when you started?  Is this new venture one with a vision of profit and regenerative to the world.  Is the true cost of the model  incorporated in the operating costs of the business.

Most existing business don’t have any provisions for this.  They were formed before these notions were considered and still many are being formed without consideration for the true costs and benefits for the world.

A new type of corporate structure called a B-Corp is now becoming one of the models for the future of corporations.  Guidelines of how to operate better with an ethos that is compelling all while potentially saving or making more money.

Generation Investment Management is investing in public and private companies using positive screens on best operating practices for the long term benefit on multiple fronts in almost any sector and its results  show this works.

Yet Jed Emerson, a long time authority of Mission Related Investing (MRI) just wrote a wonderful paper on the challenges and limitations of sustainable investing today.  The paper “Beyond Good vs. Evil” concludes that ” if we hope to achieve the long term vision shared by many—a vision of sustainability and integrity within those same global capital markets—we have no choice but to challenge our thinking, to move beyond a small community of like minded actors to a larger, diverse community of investors, stakeholders and asset owners.”

Change will happen, it has to happen.  We need to realize the need for new models is more pressing then ever and existing companies do not change fast enough.  This is why new ventures are always being born.  Some as in Clean Tech require huge amounts of equity capital and government help which will challenge the notion of viability as apposed to sustainability.  Then there are new businesses that are challenging the norm and unique in business models built from ground up,  but will require help in strategy, structuring, scaling  and eventual access to the capital markets for that scaling.  Firms like Equilibrium Capital are helping this next generation of sustainable companies build up and scale.

We need to help fund and build companies that have an impact to the status quo. That are change agents. That can make a difference and scale.  The opportunity is huge the outcome potentially enormous.

  • Share